
Prior art searching is an important, but very time-consuming, part of the patent process. An applicant may optionally choose to run its own prior art search prior to filing an application. However, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will conduct its search later, during substantive examination. The result is that truly relevant art may surfaces only months or years have passed, when claim scope is already in motion and prosecution strategy is underway.
To help address this timing gap, the USPTO launched the Artificial Intelligence Search Automated Pilot Program, commonly referred to as ASAP!. In short, ASAP! allows certain applicants to request an automated, AI-assisted prior art search before substantive examination begins, and to receive the USPTO’s AI-generated search results early in the lifecycle of the application.
What is ASAP! and what do you receive?
If your application is accepted into the ASAP! pilot, the USPTO will conduct an automated search using an internal AI system that draws context from the application’s cooperative patent classification (CPC) and the specification, claims, and abstract.
The USPTO then issues an Automated Search Results Notice (ASRN). The ASRN lists up to 10 references identified and ranked by the system. Importantly, the ASRN is not an Office Action and does not require a response - it is intended as an early informational notice.
Why would someone want to use ASAP!?
ASAP! is best thought of as an early-warning system. Even sophisticated applicants can benefit from learning, early, what the USPTO’s search tools see as the closest art.
Common reasons an applicant may consider the pilot include:
- De-risking prosecution early: If the ASRN identifies a close reference, you may decide to adjust course sooner rather than later.
- Proactive claim strategy: With earlier insight, an applicant may choose to file a preliminary amendment to refine claims before examination gets underway.
- Resource allocation decisions: If the early art looks challenging, ASAP! may support a business decision about whether to proceed, pivot, or stop, before investing more time and cost.
- Portfolio consistency: For companies filing frequently, a standardized early-search checkpoint may help align internal review, inventor expectations, and outside counsel strategy.
The USPTO has also noted that the pilot is intended to help evaluate whether sharing automated search results early can improve overall quality and efficiency.
Key requirements (who is eligible?)
ASAP! is not available for every application. The USPTO’s published eligibility requirements for ASAP! include:
- The application must be an original, noncontinuing, nonprovisional utility application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) (i.e., not a continuation/divisional/CIP and not a design/plant/reissue, etc.).
- The application must be filed on/after October 20, 2025, and a petition requesting participation in the ASAP! Pilot must be submitted no later than April 20, 2026 (unless the pilot closes earlier due to capacity).
- The applicant must file an ASAP! petition using Form PTO/SB/470 electronically in Patent Center on the same day as the application filing.
- The application’s specification, claims, and abstract must be submitted in DOCX at filing.
- The applicant must be enrolled in the Patent Center e-Office Action program.
What does it cost?
Initially, a processing fee under 37 C.F.R. § 1.17(f) was required, However, the USPTO is waiving the petition fee for a petition to participate in the program that is filed on or after March 23, 2026.
How long is the program running?
The USPTO began accepting petitions October 20, 2025. The pilot is scheduled to accept petitions until April 20, 2026, or earlier if capacity is reached. The USPTO has increased the number of applications that will be accepted into the program to 3,200 patent applications distributed across Technology Centers (TCs), including at least 400 applications per TC that examines utility applications.
How AI is changing prior art searches (and prosecution)
ASAP! is part of a broader shift. AI-assisted searching increasingly complements traditional keyword and classification searching. AI tools can be strong at identifying conceptually similar disclosures even when terminology differs (for example, where an invention is described using different jargon across industries).
For prosecution, that shift tends to move effort earlier:
- earlier identification of likely hurdles,
- earlier claim refinement,
- and potentially fewer late-stage surprises.
At the same time, AI outputs still require human review—both because relevance is context-dependent and because any meaningful strategy decision depends on what the reference actually teaches, not just how it was ranked.
A practical way to think about ASAP!
If you are filing a qualifying utility application during the pilot window, ASAP! can be a low-cost way (currently no petition fee) to get an early snapshot of what the USPTO’s automated tools may view as the closest prior art—before you are deep into examination.
Senior AttorneyJoseph’s practice focuses on evaluating and securing domestic and international patents for clients in the wireless communications and computing technologies industries.
He regularly analyzes patents related to industry ...
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- USPTO’s ASAP! Pilot Program: An Early, AI-Assisted Prior Art “Heads Up” for New Patent Filings
- How Can I Quickly Get a Patent in Germany?
- The USPTO’s SPARK Pilot Program: Incentivizing U.S. Leadership in Standards Development
- SMED Declarations Under 35 U.S.C. § 101: The Evidentiary Limits of Uncorroborated Inventor Testimony
- The POSITA Under BRI: The Constraint That Keeps “Broad” from Becoming “Anything”
- Open Source, Closed Door: Managing Patent Risk in Open Source (OSS)-Driven Products
- Rethinking Global Patent Strategy: India Belongs on the List
- New Copyright Office Rule Makes Registering Artworks Easier and More Affordable
- Sharpening the Sword, Exposing the Shield: SDD Practice and the Ironburg “Skilled Searcher” Standard
- From Shield to Sword: Using Examiner-Considered Art to Beat § 325(d)
Archives
- March 2026
- February 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- November 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- August 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- October 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
