THE COLLABORATIVE SEARCH PILOT PROGRAM
In an attempt to expedite and promote the quality of patent application examination, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) began a Collaborative Search Pilot (CSP) program in partnership with the Japan Patent Office (JPO) and the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). The program is designed to provide USPTO examiners with the best prior art by collaborating with examiners at the JPO and KIPO that are examining corresponding Japanese and Korean patent applications.
In the initial CSP program, examiners shared and combined prior art searches before issuing office actions for the patent applicant. The initial program tested a “serial” search and evaluation process with the JPO and a “parallel” search and evaluation process with the KIPO.
Under the “serial” search pilot program, either the USPTO or JPO (whichever held the application with the earliest filing date) conducted an initial search and evaluation. Subsequently, the initiating office shared the results with the second office, which then performed a second search and evaluation.
Under the “parallel” search and evaluation process, the USPTO and KIPO examiners performed a “parallel” search on substantially similar claims. The search and evaluation stage at the USPTO substantially coincided with the search and evaluation stage at the KIPO. Both offices then exchanged and combined results.
The initial program was designed to provide applicants with the examiners’ search results and optional interviews prior to full examination of the claims. As a result, the applications completed in the initial CSP program had significantly reduced prosecution times. Additionally, the first completed phase of the CSP program exceeded a 90 percent allowance rate.
THE EXPANDED COLLABORATIVE SEARCH PILOT PROGRAM
On November 1, 2017, the USPTO improved and refined the initial phase of the CSP program by launching an expanded CSP program. The expanded CSP program continues to partner the USPTO with the JPO and KIPO, however, the expanded program is designed to scale, and it is expected that the USPTO will announce additional future partner IP Offices in time. The expanded version, like the original CSP program, creates an inter-reliant environment between offices by combining and sharing searches and evaluations. However, participants are no longer required to use the First Action Interview Pilot Program (FAI), which bifurcated the prior art search from issuance of an office action. Instead, applications in expanded CSP will be accorded special status prior to First Action on the Merits (FAOM) and prior art references provided through the exchange of search results will be included in the FAOM.
As in the initial CSP program’s KIPO pilot, under the expanded CSP program, examiners in partnering IP offices perform a parallel search on substantially similar claims. The application process at the USPTO significantly corresponds with the application process at the partnering IP office. For instance, the search and evaluation stage at the USPTO coincides with the search and evaluation stage at the JPO and/or the KIPO.
After the USPTO and the partnering offices grant an applicant’s petitions to use the program, the applications are placed on the examiners’ “special” dockets – meaning the examiners have four months to provide search results to the corresponding office. After exchanging search results, each office has the opportunity to reevaluate their search results before sending an office action to the applicant. Below is the parallel search and evaluation process under the expanded CSP program.
Benefits of Participation
For those considering the expanded CSP program, it is useful to note the following key benefits for participation:
- Greater consistency in examinations across Offices, leading to more certainty of IP rights;
- Availability of prior art and previous actions to later examination offices, yielding faster prosecution and higher quality patents;
- Priority placement of applications resulting in expedited search results and final disposition, in other words, free accelerated examination;
- Potential reduced prosecution, yielding cost savings to applicants;
- A reduced likelihood of receiving foreign art during pendency of examination that may result in the need to file an IDS or RCE that could delay examination; and
- Free petition in the USPTO.
Qualifications for Participation
To qualify for the program, applicants must have unexamined, corresponding counterpart applications (filed no earlier than 3/16/13) in the USPTO and a partnering office. Applicants may utilize the same USPTO applications to qualify for the program with multiple IP Offices. Additionally, no-cost petitions must be filed in the USPTO and the corresponding Office(s), in accordance with the respective office’s rules. The petitions must include up to three corresponding independent claims. Other restrictions include a limit of twenty total claims and no multiple dependent claims in the USPTO application.
The offices began accepting petitions on November 1, 2017, and will continue to do so for three years. However, applications will be limited to 400 per year for each agreement.
Jamie assists clients with developing, enforcing and defending their intellectual property rights through strategic patents. She also assists in matters related to litigation.
Given her varied technical background, she ...
Michael’s natural and engaging approach in laying out alternatives and potential outcomes is genuinely appreciated by clients. He advances their causes with all-encompassing intellectual property portfolio management ...
- Non-Disclosure Agreement Lessons from SiOnyx LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. (Decided December 7, 2020)
- Judiciary Responds to Cybersecurity Breach: New Procedure Enacted to Safeguard Highly Sensitive Documents
- One Bite at the Apple: How the Outcome of a Previous Patent Litigation Can Impact Later Lawsuits
- Congressional Spending Bill Includes Significant Trademark and Copyright Rules
- Patent Inventor Teamwork Doesn't Always Make the Dream Work
- Brexit and Trademarks: The Time Is Now
- Demystifying 2020’s Standard Essential Patents and FRAND Licensing Disputes
- Better Inventor Communication – Hidden Cost Savings In Patent Prosecution
- Sovereign Immunity, The 11th Amendment, and Intellectual Property
- Trouble Ahead for Global Data Exchanges: The Court of Justice of the EU Strikes Down “Privacy Shield”
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- October 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017