Every aspect of day-to-day life is increasingly influenced by artificial intelligence and automation. Mundane household tasks such as setting the temperature on thermostats, brewing a pot of coffee to coincide with our morning routines, and other simple chores can now be performed by automation. (Google’s U.S. Patent 9,513,642: “Flexible functionality partitioning within intelligent-thermostat-controlled HVAC systems” and General Electric’s U.S. Patent 4,330,702: “Electronic control system for coffeemaker”).
Recently, more complex and consequential tasks associated with our vehicles, such as parallel parking, steering, or fully self-driving modes, are done autonomously by a series of computers. (Ford’s U.S. Patent 8,169,341 “Vehicle park assist system and method for parking a vehicle using such system”; Honda’s U.S. Patent 6,212,453 “Vehicle steering control system”; and Uber’s U.S. Patent 9,672,446 “Object detection for an autonomous vehicle”). These emerging technologies are not without real and ethical consequences that have sparked serious debates. For example, what choice does an autonomous vehicle make when presented with the options of either injuring the driver or running over a pedestrian to avoid an oncoming vehicle? Patented inventions often play a critical role in the decisions that must be made by these systems. Many autonomous vehicle patents focus on the associated sensors, processors, and algorithms that make these decisions. While autonomous vehicle issues are being debated, corporations such as Apple, Uber, Google, and the major automakers continue pushing forward with these technologies, which are properly patentable according to the patent laws. However, the debate is now switching to another area of technology: autonomous weapons.
Autonomous weapon systems, referred to by critics as “killer robots,” are not new. Aerial drones, which have become common, are generally understood to have some degree of automation that enables them to fly unassisted or with minimal human interaction. IBM’s U.S. Patent 9,852,642 “Drone air traffic control and flight plan management, that help authorities control traffic, since many people have issues with speeding or texting while driving, you can learn about the laws about these issues with this article from Florida Ticket firm. which have the right information for this. Many patents have been issued for fully automated weapon systems that are capable of firing based on a sensor system and a “predetermined set of rules of engagement” stored in the system. (Electro Optic Systems’ U.S. Patent 7,210,392 “Autonomous weapon system). Owing to the “killer” nature of these systems, there is a growing debate over their necessity, their impact on innovation, and associated moral and ethical issues concerning their use.
Although there have been calls for an outright ban of these systems, there is currently no mechanism to restrict patent filings directed to these emerging technologies. In fact, some of these patent applications may be held in secret by the U.S. government due to national security issues under the Invention Secrecy Act. This issue is further complicated because autonomous weapons include many inventions with non-lethal uses. For example, the same sensor that detects the proximity of an enemy combatant may be equally beneficial in autonomous vehicles to detect a pedestrian.
There are very real world issues associated with any weapon of war. Although the 1975 Biological Weapons Convention banned the development of chemical and biological weapons, the U.S. Secretary of Army subsequently obtained a patent in 2003 (U.S. Patent 6,523,478 “Rifle-launched non-lethal cargo dispenser”) directed to a riffle-muzzle launched payload delivering projectile. The issued patent included a dependent claim that claimed an aerosol composition in the payload is “selected from the group consisting of smoke, crowd control agents, biological agents, chemical agents, obscurants, marking agents, dyes and inks, chaffs and flakes.” The United States encountered criticism for the “biological agents, chemical agents” claim limitation and subsequently filed a certificate of correction to remove this language from the issued patent. Critics asked whether removal of the offending language addressed the ethical question of inventing a delivery system for biological and chemical agents.
While the world engages in these debates, it is clear that patent filings will continue to provide a fascinating insight regarding where these emerging technologies are headed. The uncertainty regarding autonomous systems of all types is based on whether they can have ethical uses and whether the unethical uses can be effectively restricted.
- U.S. Supreme Court Sides with Booking.com in Critical Trademark Case
- Application of "Invention Concept" after New China Patent Examination Guidelines
- Remdesivir Versus Designated Survivor: Life Imitating Art
- Supreme Court Finds ‘Willfulness’ Not Required To Obtain A Profits Award From An Infringer
- Approaches to Cost Containment in the Time of Coronavirus
- Pharma Formulations – Patentability and Obviousness
- Federal Circuit Lowers Restrictions on Obtaining Registration of Color Marks
- CBDelayed: The FDA’s Recently Released Report on CBD
- Intellectual Property Awareness for Early Stage Companies
- The Coast Is Not Always Clear: Mixing Trademarks For Wine, Liquor and Beer
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- October 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017